Collaborative design in electromagnetics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive permettant à la Bibliothèque et Archives Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public par télécommunication ou par l'Internet, prêter, distribuer et vendre des thèses partout dans le monde, à des fins commerciales ou autres, sur support microforme, papier, électronique et/ou autres formats.L'auteur conserve la propriété du droit d'auteur et des droits moraux qui protège cette thèse.Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés ou autrement reproduits sans son autorisation.Conformément à la loi canadienne sur la protection de la vie privée, quelques formulaires secondaires ont été enlevés de cette thèse.Bien que ces formulaires aient inclus dans la pagination, il n'y aura aucun contenu manquant.120 The fourth control cycle occurs at time Il min, when ANSYS completes.It returns a value for the force on the plunger.The task manager evalutes the execution conditions for all four KSs.ANSYS has 0 of 1 conditions satisfied, MagNet has 0 of 2 (previously 0 of 2), SPICE has 1 of 1 (previously 1 of 1), and ThermNet has 1 of 1 (previously 1 of 1).No KS saw an increase in its number of satisfied conditions, so the task manager sets act(ANSYS, MagNet), act(ANSYS, SPICE), act(ANSYS, ThermNet) all to o. SPICE and ThermNet both satisfy aU their execution conditions; furthermore, there are no other running KSs that they could benefit from waiting for, so both are dispatched immediately.The system state is summarized in table 4-6.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS l want to express my appreciation to my supervisor, D.A. Lowther, for his many enlightening discussions, as weU as for his useful comments on the preliminary version of this thesis.His advice, patience, and sense of humor over the past years have been invaluable.l am also thankful to Infolytica for providing us with the licenses for MagNet and ThermNet, and for their feedback.l would like to thank my past and present friends in CADLAB with whom l shared the good time and the stresses during our studies.l thank them aU for the great working environment that we had, which made our lives more enjoyable.Finally, this thesis could
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.033 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".