The Condition and Perceptions of Common Property Regimes on the Caribbean Coast of Nicaragua and their Revitalization through Participatory Action-Research
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
"The Pearl Lagoon is one in which the normal antagonistic relation between colonial powers and common- property regimes is not obvious. However, the articulation of Pearl Lagoon with the global economy is, undoubtedly, beginning to show the effects documented by Kottak (1992) in a Brazilian coastal community of: breakdown in cooperative agreements, resource sharing, barter exchange. This articulation, based on neo-liberal economic policies, will probably negatively influence collectively-based patterns of resource management. A countervailing influence has been the PAR process that Pearl Lagoon communities have been engaged in. The creation of a body of shared information on resource management issues and tangible actions are a valuable first step towards maintaining and building upon extant regimes and aspirations of community members. PAR also provides the academic researcher with a research methodology to mutually define research goals with community members--a process that can result in improved understanding of how biological and social mechanisms influence resource management regimes, while supporting common property regimes."
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it