MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6980699506

Continuidades y rupturas en Uruguay

2012· article· es· W6980699506 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAmericanae (AECID Library) · 2012
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldMedicine
TopicSex and Gender in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDictatorshipPoliticsDemocracyDemocratic systemQuarter (Canadian coin)Government (linguistics)Period (music)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El presente artículo intenta indagar en la historia del Uruguay reciente, concretamente en las experiencias socioculturales y políticas vividas por este país del Cono Sur de América en el último cuarto del siglo XX. La razón de esta elección parte de la permanencia en la actualidad de una serie de conflictos que tienen que ver con las memorias individuales, sociales, grupales e históricas de un reciente pasado traumático. La fractura institucional del sistema democrático representado por la dictadura cívico militar (1973-1985) marcó y marca una inflexión que ha dejado sus huellas más allá de la recuperación democrática a partir de 1985. The present essay explores recent Uruguayan history, specifically those socio-cultural and political events experienced in the last quarter of the XX century. The reason for selecting this period is based on the continuous presence in contemporary society of a series of conflicts related to individual, social, collective and historical memories originating in a recent traumatic past. The institutional fracture inside a political system -represented by the civil-military dictatorship (1973-1985)- still can be perceived beyond the democratic transition of 1985.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.205
Threshold uncertainty score0.407

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmericanae (AECID Library)Same topicSex and Gender in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207