Conociendo el aprendizaje y la convievencia en el CRA Pinar Grande de Navaleno en el provincia de Soria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este trabajo tiene como objetivo profundizar en el estudio de las escuelas en el \námbito rural desde diferentes puntos de vista, la labor de los docentes, la diversidad del \nalumnado en las aulas, la organización de un CRA, etc. atendiendo a las causas que \nhacen que el trabajo en un CRA sea una peculiar tarea, tan compleja como satisfactoria. \nEl estudio se ha realizado desde una investigación cualitativa, de enfoque \ndescriptivo. En la primera parte del trabajo, dedicada a la fundamentación teórica, se ha \noptado por un análisis bibliográfico. Finalmente, en la segunda parte se ha formulado \nuna propuesta de intervención educativa adaptada a las necesidades que presenta un \nCRA, pudiendo ser desarrollada en las aulas de los centros de las diferentes localidades \nque pertenecen al CRA “Pinar Grande” de Navaleno.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".