Cook County Winter Trail-based Visitor Study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Minnesota Sea Grant and the University of Minnesota \nDuluth Bureau of Business and Economic Research conducted \nthe Cook County Winter Trail-based Visitor Study in \nthe last quarter of 2002 (an atypical winter with little snow). \nResearch assistants contacted a random sample of 162 \nhouseholds in Cook County, MN, by phone. A random \nadult in the home was asked a short set of questions about \nvisitors who cross-country (x-c) ski and snowmobile in \nCook County (65% cooperation). Additionally, 96 randomlychosen \nCook County hospitality businesses were interviewed \nusing the same questions (53% cooperation). \nThe 51 business respondents and the residents, broken \ninto two groups of 31 business owners or managers, and \n74 non-business respondents, did not differ much in their \nperceptions of winter visitors. However, statistically significant \ndifferences in views are seen between respondents \nwhen grouped by their winter recreation participation (ski \nonly, snowmobile only, both, and neither).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it