Bibliographic record
Abstract
L e mercredi 17 mars dernier, en rponse une invitation lance dans l'ensemble du rseau collgial par le CCDMD, 21 responsables de centres d'aide en franais ont quitt Rimouski, Qubec, Shawinigan, voire Alma pour se rencontrer et discuter centres d'aide en franais.Plusieurs autres n'ont pu participer la journe, non pas par manque d'intrt mais plutt par manque de ressources nancires ou en raison de leurs obligations.D'ailleurs, il faut souligner ici que Charles-Henri Audet, responsable du Tandem du cgep de Sainte-Foy, a mme pris soin de faire parvenir par crit ses commentaires, compte tenu de son incapacit se joindre au groupe.C'est dire le besoin que cette journe satisfaisait, d'autant plus que cet intercaf arrivait aprs plusieurs annes sans rendez-vous collectif.La rencontre d'une journe, qui a eu lieu au collge de Maisonneuve, visait dresser un tat la fois de la situation actuelle et des besoins.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.115 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".