MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6980932017

Derechos de imagen sobre los deportistas menores de edad

2015· article· es· W6980932017 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica (Universidad Europea) · 2015
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Education and Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)Quarter (Canadian coin)Sign (mathematics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dentro de un espectáculo deportivo, la imagen del deportista es uno de los bienes más preciados y sometido a \ndiversidad de pactos. Por ello, cuando aparece la figura del menor de edad, es absolutamente necesario una regulación clara y \nexhaustiva que evite malas interpretaciones y abusos, donde el joven jugador tenga una significación elevada pero bajo la \nprotección pública, ante sí mismo, y ante los diversos elementos que le rodean (clubes, Federaciones, padres, agentes, \ncompañeros y autoridades públicas). Aportar luz a estas relaciones, así como algunas soluciones de lege ferenda es nuestra \nintención.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica (Universidad Europea)Same topicEngineering Education and PedagogyFrench-language works237,207