MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6980959027

Decoding cytokine dynamics with biochemical networks

2020· dissertation· en· W6980959027 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGene Regulatory Network Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterpretabilityContext (archaeology)CytokineDecoding methodsENCODEImmune systemLigand (biochemistry)Simple (philosophy)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

T cells defend their hosts by scanning other cells for ligands from potentially pathogenic sources.Upon antigen detection, they produce and consume extracellular proteins called cytokines to communicate with each other.Those messenger proteins play a fundamental role in scaling the nonlinear, out-of-equilibrium immune response.Yet, no quantitative theory exists to systematically account for the dynamics of multiple cytokines at once.However, state-of-the-art experimental data from our collaborators (Altan-Bonnet lab, NIH) reveal that cytokine concentrations encode information about the strength, or quality, of the ligands detected by the T cells.In this thesis, we combine cytokine biology, information theory, and nonlinear dynamics to establish theoretical models for cytokines.Previous modelling attempts in this direction suffer from excessive complexity or describe only one cytokine, so we adopt a different angle.We formulate an inverse problem: how do T cells decode cytokine time courses to infer ligand quality?We give a proper definition of information processing in this context and look for biochemical networks that perform this function.Extending the evolutionary algorithm -evo, we find a network relying on a combination of cytokines IL-2, IL-6, and TNF-.We are able to simplify and solve it analytically.The simplified network predicts ligand quality with an accuracy of 80% in various experimental repeats collected over two years by our collaborators.We obtain a lower bound of (1.05 0.08) bits for the information content of cytokine time courses about ligand quality.The network's interpretability yields important biophysical insights: for instance, it provides a simple mechanism for time-averaging cytokine signals in T cells.It also opens up new questions grounded in physics about collective computations and information processing in biology.vi I first want to thank my advisor, Prof. Paul Franois, for his flawless support over the past two years.His inexhaustible capacity to find new ideas and his optimism proved salutary for my own motivation.He is both a driving and humane mentor.In addition, I am very lucky to have collaborated with Grgoire Altan-Bonnet's laboratory.They displayed outstanding hospitality in welcoming me for two separate

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicGene Regulatory Network AnalysisFrench-language works237,207