DESA1002 'Nine Quarter City' - <Van Khanh Phan>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
\tThe idea of designing a hotel in Venice was decided due to the fame of this city, so many tourists want to visit this city at least once. Therefore, each unforgettable moment living in a nice hotel is very important. \tThe most interesting feature of my building is the changing direction part. My building has two different parts, one is quite ‘static’ and one is quite ‘dynamic’. With the ‘dynamic’ part, each level of the building has its own direction, consequently, tourists can have many different views from different angles, and if someone did live on the level 1, they would really want to come back and try the room on other levels. Moreover, the changing direction idea also represents the variety of canals in this city. \tIn addition, tourists can easily recognise this hotel due to the shape of the roof. Roof of this hotel includes many triangles pieces of glass combined with steel frame. The breaking down one big roof into many smaller roofs with many different angles provides various and nice views for tourists at night when the dinner is served in a small restaurant on the top floor. Roof top is not only the terrace but also the beautiful place for tourists to have a nice dinner with very beautiful sky with plenty of stars above. \tMoreover, this hotel has one side facing to the Grand Canal, and this side is one side of the changing direction part as well. The multidirectional part includes levels that jut out directly to the canal; therefore, it provides the floating feeling for tourists living here. \tThe location of this hotel is also nice; one side is canal, other sides are roads, consequently, it is easier to find this hotel in a very beautiful city like Venice. Welcome to Venice Hotel
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".