MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6981055865

Development of LC-HRMS Assay for the Measurement of 12 Mycotoxins in Urine

2022· dissertation· en· W6981055865 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSpectrum Research Repository (Concordia University) · 2022
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnatomy and Medical Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOchratoxin AMycotoxinBiomonitoringFumonisin B1OchratoxinAlternariolZearalenoneBeauvericinPopulation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mycotoxins are the secondary metabolites of certain molds. These toxic compounds naturally contaminate food products and beverages and can cause severe health effects in humans and animals. Environmental changes and industrialization are currently promoting the spread of these mycotoxins worldwide. Health Canada regularly monitors the levels of specific mycotoxins in various food products. Complementarily to food monitoring, periodic biomonitoring is especially important to determine the exposure to mycotoxins in the Canadian population considering the variability of individual diets and metabolism. Urine biomonitoring is a non-invasive approach and sample collection is easy. The purpose of this study is to develop a sensitive and accurate LC-HRMS method for the detection in urine of 12 mycotoxins that impact human health. These mycotoxins are enniatin A (ENNA), enniatin A1 (ENNA1), enniatin B (ENNB), enniatin B1 (ENNB1), alternariol (AOH), alternariol monomethyl ether (AME), beauvericin (BEA), citrinin (CIT), fumonisin B1 (FB1), fumonisin B2 (FB2), ochratoxin A (OTA) and ochratoxin alpha (OTα). The final 24-min LC-HRMS method used CORTECS T3 reversed-phase separation and employed time-segmented polarity switching to cover the 12 analytes of interest in a single analysis. To allow high-throughput for large-scale monitoring, two sample preparation procedures were evaluated: "dilute-and-shoot" and solid-phase extraction with hydrophilic and lipophilic sorbent (HLB SPE). Evaluation of solubility and non-specific adsorption with the dilute-and-shoot method revealed that enniatins (ENNs) and BEA have low solubility in a highly aqueous solvent (H2O/ACN/FA 94/5/1 v/v) with a 70-98% decrease in signal intensity compared to a highly organic solvent (MeOH/ H2O/ FA 60/39/1 v/v). This issue also caused loss of ENNs and BEA during storage of urine samples in plastic containers. Rinsing the containers with MeOH allowed the recovery of 17, 30, 57, 44 and 67% of ENNB, ENNB1, ENNA, ENNA1, and BEA, respectively. Use of 20x dilution in the dilute-and-shoot method resulted in LOQs > 2 ng/mL for almost all mycotoxins, which are present at < 1 ng/mL in real samples. Thus, dilute-and-shoot is not sensitive enough for the intended application, so HLB SPE was used for sample clean-up and enrichment. This sample preparation method recovered 68 - 88% of all the mycotoxins tested with 10x enrichment, which led to significant ionization suppression of CIT, OTα, OTA, AOH, AME and FB1. Reducing their enrichment decreased the matrix effects for all the mycotoxins (77% - 150%) except for AOH (22%) and AME (66%), which was compensated for by the addition of an internal standard (AMEd3). An optimized HLB SPE LC-HRMS method is proposed for validation and further application to real samples in the biomonitoring of mycotoxins in urine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.567
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpectrum Research Repository (Concordia University)Same topicAnatomy and Medical TechnologyFrench-language works237,207