Discovery Potential of A/H->ττ->lh in ATLAS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This note describes a study of the discovery potential for the supersymmetric Higgs bosons $H/A$ in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 14 TeV in final states with $\\tau$-lepton pairs with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. The Higgs bosons are produced in association with $b$-quarks or from gluon-fusion processes and decay into a di-$\\tau$ final state. The final state where one $\\tau$ lepton decays leptonically and the other hadronically is studied. Higgs boson masses between 150 and 800 GeV are analysed. All results are obtained using the ATLFAST-II simulation of the ATLAS detector except for the determination of the trigger efficiencies. For the latter, selected signal samples are processed with full simulation. Procedures to estimate the contribution of all relevant backgrounds from control regions in data have been developed. The discovery potential in the $m_A$ vs. $\\tan\\beta$ plane is assessed for the $m_h^\\mathrm{max}$ MSSM benchmark scenario and compared to that obtained previously in the fully-leptonic analysis. No pile-up or cavern background has been considered in this analysis. The analysis is based on an integrated luminosity of $30$ fb$^-1$.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".