MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6981205073

Diz Osteoartritinde Klasik Fizyoterapi ve Farklı Nöromusküler Fasilitasyon Tekniklerinin Ağrı, Eklem Hareket Açıklığı, Kas Kuvveti, Propriosepsiyon, Postüral Kontrol, Diz Fonksiyonları ve Fonksiyonel Performans Üzerine Olan Etkilerinin Karşılaştırılması

2020· dissertation· en· W6981205073 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueHacettepe University Institutional Repository (hacettepe.edu.tr) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsteoarthritisRange of motionProprioceptionStair climbingRehabilitationMuscle strengthBalance (ability)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gökşen, A., Comparison of Effectiveness of Classical Physiotherapy and Different 'Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation' Techniques on Pain, Proprioception, Postural Control, Muscle Strength, Joint Range of Motion and Knee Functions in Knee Osteoarthritis; Hacettepe University, Institute of Health Sciences, Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Program, Ph.D. Thesis, Ankara, 2020. This study was conducted to compare the effects of classical physiotherapy and different 'Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF)' techniques on pain, proprioception, postural control, muscle strength, muscular endurance, range of motion (ROM), knee functions and functional performance in knee osteoarthritis (OA). The study included 35 patients between the ages of 47 and 62 who were diagnosed with stage 1-2 KOA. The patients were divided into three groups with block randomization method as Classical Physiotherapy Group (n = 12), PNF-1 Group (n = 12) with Repeated Stretching (TG) Technique, PNF-2 Group (n = 11) with Combined Isotonic Contractions (ICC) technique. PNF was applied to all patterns of the lower extremity in full pattern and patients in all groups were treated for 6 weeks, 3 days a week. ROM with ''Goniometer'', knee pain with ''Visual Analogue Scale'' and ''Algometer'', muscle strength, muscle endurance and proprioception with '' Biodex®System Pro3''; postural control with "Berg Balance scale" and "Biodex®System Pro3 (Biodex Corp. Shirley NY, USA)"; Knee functions with ''Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score'' and '' Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index'', functional performance related to the knee with '' Time to Walk (TUG) '', "6 Minute Walk Test" and "Step Climbing Test (BTT)" was evaluated before and after the treatment. Functional performance and knee extensor muscle strength with CIC technique showed more improvement than the other methods and CIC showed more improvement compared to the classical physiotherapy in terms of knee joint position sensation evaluated at 60 ° (p <0.05). Both PNF methods were superior to the classical physiotherapy in terms of pain parameter related to knee function, muscular endurance, mediolateral balance with eyes open and total balance score (p <0.05). In conclusion, all methods were effective in patients with early-stage knee osteoarthritis; however, it was seen the most effective results was obtained by PNF using CIC technique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.529
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it