Douze ans de recherche en alphabétisation des adultes en français au Canada : 1994-2005
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le rapport synthèse sur la recherche en alphabétisation comporte deux parties principales. La première, intitulée Portrait synthèse des recherches en alphabétisation en français au Canada : 1994-2005, propose un bilan de la recherche et présente des éléments de synthèse sur le contexte des recherches, les thèmes de recherche, les auteurs, les années de publication, les types de recherche, les sources de\nfinancement et les lieux de production. Elle offre ainsi une mise en perspective notamment au regard de l’évolution et des tendances de la recherche.\n\nLa deuxième partie propose, quant à elle, un portrait thématique : celui-ci consiste en une analyse thématique des recherches. On y trouve alors plus de détails sur chaque thème retenu avec ses sous-thèmes et ses auteurs ainsi qu’un résumé\nqui précède la liste des recherches classées sous le thème.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.029 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.012 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".