Effect of road salt on soil and water properties in Halifax, Nova Scotia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Road salt is a crucial public safety tool to protect people on winter roads, but it disperses from roads and impacts the environment.Increased salinity affects both soil and water systems with adverse effects observed on vegetation, nutrient cycling, and aquatic organisms.Nova Scotia applies the most road salt of all the Canadian provinces per unit area with a total of 230,182 tonnes.I compiled and analyzed water conductivity data for the Halifax Regional Municipality (HRM) from datasets provided by the Department of Fisheries and Oceans and Halifax Water to determine the spatial and temporal trends in conductivity.Conductivity has been increasing in most HRM lakes since at least 1980, but seasonal trends were inconsistent.To better understand salinity of soil and lakes, fieldwork was conducted at five lakes in Dartmouth, Nova Scotia that represented sites exposed to or protected from road salt.At each lake, we sampled water and soil on a side that was closer to roads/road salt application, and on another side further away.Statistical analysis showed no significant effect of proximity to road salt application on water conductivity (P = 0.834).There was a significant difference between protected and exposed sites (P = 0.0187).Soil electrical conductivity was also measured on both sides of the lakes at distances of 0, 10, and 20 m from the lake before (fall) and after (winter) road salt application.Soil conductivity was significantly higher at 0 m (compared to 10 m, P = 0.020, and compared to 20 m, P < 0.001) and before road salt application (P = 0.014).There was no significant effect of protection (P = 0.079) or proximity to road salt application (P = 0.184) on soil conductivity.Based on these results, I concluded that road salt is negatively impacting many lakes in the HRM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".