Endangered Egyptian Vulture (neophron Percnopterus) Entangled in a Power Line Ground-wire Stabilizer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The North American breeding distribution of Short-eared Owls ranges from western Alaska east through Canada to Newfoundland, south to central California, and east across the north-central states to New Jersey (Johnsgard 1988) Holt and Leasure (1993) indicate that this species occurs yem;round north and west of West Virginia while northern breeding populations are migratory.Our observations and accounts from others suggest that this species may be expanding its range along the southern edge of the previously reported North American breeding range.Several accounts have confirmed Short-eared Owl presence and breeding on coastal grassland habitats in Virginia, Maryland, and North Carolina (11iff 2001, N. Am.Birds 55:284-287).Besides West Virginia, Short-eared Owl breeding also has been documented on reclaimed mine sites in Kentucky (Stamm and Clay 1989, Kentuchy Warbler 65:75-76); howevex; breeding populations appear to be restricted to a fkw larger reclaimed areas (Palmer-Ball et al. 1990, Kentuchy Warbler 66:73-80).This species exhibits some degree of nomadism with fairly long-distance movements by juveniles and adults (Clark 1975, Wildl.Monog• 47:1-67, Cramp 1985, Oxford Univ.Press, Oxf•)rd, UK, Mikkola 1983, Br.Birds 65:453-460).Such behavior undoubtedly contributes to the ability of Short-eared Owls to lind and colonize the newly-created grassland habitats in eastern states, allowing an expansion of the breeding range.This range expansion may be temporary, howevex; after succession renders these sites unsuitable for Short-eared Owls.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".