MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6981530919

Enzymatic Electro-reduction of Carbon Dioxide to Formate by Directly Immobilized NAD+-independent Formate Dehydrogenase

2023· dissertation· en· W6981530919 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicItalian Fascism and Post-war Society
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersStrong
KeywordsFormateCarbon dioxideFormate dehydrogenaseElectrochemical reduction of carbon dioxideSelectivityElectrochemistryCatalysisCarbon dioxide in Earth's atmosphere
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Global warming has been raising concerns for the state of the climate and the resulting adverse effects, due to the rise in levels of greenhouse gases including methane, nitrous oxide and carbon dioxide. As the atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide has been rapidly increasing each year, it is pertinent to work on the decrease of such levels through the development of renewable methods of electricity generation and development of efficient methods of conversion of CO2 to chemicals. Electrochemical conversion of CO2 into reduced C1 compounds is a useful technique to reduce carbon dioxide levels as it is easy to select the appropriate reaction conditions. As electrochemical reduction of CO2 is associated with low product selectivity and efficiency due to competition with hydrogen evolution reactions, enzymatic electroreduction of carbon dioxide can be utilized due to the high selectivity of enzymes. This thesis demonstrates novel approaches to the direct immobilization of metal-independent formate dehydrogenases on electrode surfaces to facilitate the direct catalysis of carbon dioxide reduction to formate, without the need for NADH/NAD+ cofactors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)→Same topicItalian Fascism and Post-war Society→French-language works237,207→