Entre la escena y la pantalla. Aproximaciones a la intermedialidad en la obra de Robert Lepage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Se recurre a la obra del creador canadiense Robert Lepage (Quebec, 1957), para mostrar la pertinencia de la perspectiva intermedial en el análisis de las producciones culturales contemporáneas. La intermedialidad aboga por el examen inmanente de las operaciones de mediación y de intercambio que tienen lugar durante el encuentro de diferentes sustancias y que dan pie a los fenómenos de significación. En su cuestionamiento de la identidad, la intermedialidad antepone al escrutinio del texto y de la representación, elde la materia y de las relaciones que esta establece. El trabajo de Lepage, un creador escénico y audiovisual que ha dirigido obras de teatro y de ópera, espectáculos musicales y circenses y largometrajes de ficción, no solamente es adecuado para un análisis desde la perspectiva intermedial, sino que contiene él mismo una reflexión en torno a la intermedialidad característica de las sociedades contemporáneas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".