Étude de l'action, de la pensée esthétique et de la démarche plastique de Fernand Leduc de 1953-1959
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le peintre Fernand Leduc a développé une trajectoire unique dans l'histoire de l'art québécois. Depuis 1943, il suit une démarche qui l'a mené de l'automatisme aux microchromies actuelles. Entre 1953 et 1959, durant son retour à Montréal, après un séjour de sept ans en France, Leduc vit une véritable révolution esthétique et plastique, celle du passage de l'automatisme à l'abstraction construite. Les sources de cette révolution, de nature philosophique et spirituelle, se retrouvent chez le penseur Raymond Abellio et chez le peintre Jean Bazaine qui ont marqué l'artiste dans son orientation. C'est par son action au sein du milieu de la peinture montréalaise ainsi qu'à travers sa pensée esthétique et sa démarche plastique que Leduc effectue son passage. "Portes rouges", une oeuvre de 1955, nous a semblé représenter un moment charnière de cette période.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".