Estudio de prefactibilidad para la comercialización y exportación de arándano fresco al mercado de Vancouver – Canadá
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT \nIn this report will be exposed a business plan for marketing and export of Blueberry to \nVancouver Canada. \nThis project was the need to meet the high demand for natural products with great \nbenefits to health, so that bilberry is considered a "super fruit" for its high content of \nantioxidants, as well as minerals. \nThat is why the Peruvian Blueberry has experienced in the last five years one of the \nfastest growing crops with the greatest potential in the overseas market. Furthermore, the \nPeru has competitive advantages over the rest of the world, not only for their land and \nclimatic variety, but also has the added its geographical position, with annual seasons \nreverse. \nSo we saw an opportunity to blueberries to enter Canada, not only for its regular use \nthroughout the year but also in off-season periods in which descends importantly, the \nsupply of fruit to these markets, with very good prices . \nGiven all the above, this study demonstrated that our product is a fresh blueberry viable \nalternative export with very good return on investment, taking into account the COK \n15.25% resulting the following financial ratios: VANE S/. 1.381.259 and TIRE 34,73%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".