MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6981662520

Étude de la composition des matières organiques végétales résiduelles sur les performances de croissance, les bilans de bioconversion et la qualité nutritionnelle des larves de mouches soldats noires

2020· other· fr· W6981662520 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCorpus Université Laval (Université Laval) · 2020
Typeother
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicAnimal and Plant Science Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBioconversionComposition (language)Qualitative analysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette étude visait à étudier le potentiel des larves de mouches soldats noires (MSN) à convertir les matières organiques végétales (MOV) pré-consommation à forte teneur en humidité recueillies chez les détaillants alimentaires de la région de Québec. Les MOV recueillies dans des épiceries clientes d’un collecteur de matières organiques résiduelles (MOR) local (Sanimax Inc, Québec, Canada) ont été caractérisées quantitativement (masse et fréquence des différents types de MOV) et qualitativement (matières sèches, cendres, fibres, glucides, énergie, contenu en protéines et en lipides). Différentes diètes à base de MOV ont été formulées pour alimenter des larves de mouches et tester leurs effets sur la croissance (poids moyen, longueur, largeur, rapport longueur/largeur et indice de Fulton) et la composition proximale nutritionnelle des larves de MSN. De plus, cette étude établit le rendement de conversion auquel on peut s'attendre sur ces matières par la production de larves de MSN. L’évolution de différents paramètres physico-chimique (température et pH) lors de la bioconversion et le profil nutritionnel des larves sont aussi présentés.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score0.203

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCorpus Université Laval (Université Laval)Same topicAnimal and Plant Science EducationFrench-language works237,207