Evaluating soil moisture variability using Synthetic Aperture RADAR and LiDAR-derived wetness indices
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Soil moisture spatial and temporal variability is influenced by precipitation patterns, local topography, soil texture and vegetation. This research aims to assess whether the ln('As'/tan[beta]) (Beven and Kirkby, 1979) wetness index (WI) derived from a 1 m LiDAR digital elevation model can be used as a surrogate for soil moisture spatial patterns through time by comparing Synthetic Aperture RADAR (SAR) backscatter to the WI under variable moisture regimes and using different sensor parameters. Over multiple dates spanning Fall 2009 and Spring/Fall 2010, fine quad-polarimetric mode RADARSAT-2 imagery and coincident 'in situ' surface parameter data are acquired over a small agricultural watershed in southwestern Ontario. Soil moisture maps are derived using several backscatter models and compared to 'in situ' soil moisture using goodness-of-fit statistics. The spatial pattern of soil moisture was observed to be most variable under moderate moisture regimes through evaluation of 'in situ' soil moisture data and semivariogram analysis. Both SAR-derived soil moisture and SAR linear intensity channels were compared to the WI using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient ('rs'). SAR soil moisture derived using the Oh et al. (1992) model showed the highest correlation to the WI, achieving significant but weak positive correlations at both high and low incidence angles. The cross-polarized intensity channel (HV) correlated more strongly with WI than either co-polarized channel (HH or VV), achieving significant weak to moderate 'rs' values. Standardized anomalies of soil moisture values were calculated for all SAR image acquisitions and compared to the WI using 'rs'. Discontinuous but comparable time stable points were identified using all backscatter models, although only those derived using the Oh et al. (1992) model correlated significantly to the WI. For all model outputs, most points were time stable within one standard deviation of the mean.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".