Exploiting parallelism of irregular problems and performance evaluation on heterogeneous multi-core architectures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this thesis, we design, develop and implement parallel algorithms for irregular problems on heterogeneous multi-core architectures. Irregular problems exhibit random and unpredictable memory access patterns, poor spatial locality and input dependent control flow. Heterogeneous multi-core processors vary in: clock frequency, power dissipation, programming model (MIMD vs. SIMD), memory design and computing units, scalar versus vector units. The heterogeneity of the processors makes designing efficient parallel algorithms for irregular problems on heterogeneous multicore processors challenging. Techniques of mapping tasks or data on traditional parallel computers can not be used as is on heterogeneous multi-core processors due to the varying hardware. In an attempt to understand the efficiency of futuristic heterogeneous multi-core architectures on applications we study several computation and bandwidth oriented irregular problems on one heterogeneous multi-core architecture, the IBM Cell Broadband Engine (Cell BE). The Cell BE consists of a general processor and eight specialized processors and addresses vector/data-level parallelism and instruction-level parallelism simultaneously. Through these studies on the Cell BE, we provide some discussions and insight on the performance of the applications on heterogeneous multi-core architectures. Verifying these experimental results require some performance modeling. Due to the diversity of heterogeneous multi-core architectures, theoretical performance models used for homogeneous multi-core architectures do not provide accurate results. Therefore, in this thesis we propose an analytical performance prediction model that considers the multitude architectural features of heterogeneous multi-cores (such as DMA transfers, number of instructions and operations, the processor frequency and DMA bandwidth). We show that the execution time from our prediction model is comparable to the execution time of the experimental results for a complex medical imaging application.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".