MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6981717717

EVALUATION OF b-DIKETONATE TIN AND INDIUM COMPLEXES AS PRECURSORS FOR THE PHOTODEPOSITION OF SnO2 AND In2O3 THIN FILMS

2005· article· en· W6981717717 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Electronic Library Online (Scientific Electronic Library Online) · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicNames, Identity, and Discrimination Research
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAuger electron spectroscopyThin filmAmorphous solidIndiumAnnealing (glass)Indium tin oxideScanning electron microscopeOxidizing agentTin
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SnO2 and In2O3 thin films have been succesfully prepared by direct UV irradiation of amorphous films of b-diketonate complexes on Si(100) substrates. The as-deposited films were analyzed by Auger electron spectroscopy (AES), whereas annealing was required in order to get X-ray diffraction spectra, indicating the amorphous nature of the films. The surface morphology of the films examined by Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) revealed that In2O3 films are much smoother than SnO2 films, with average surface roughness (Ra) of 3 nm and 11 nm respectively. The low resistivity values determined for these metal oxide films (3-4 x 10-4 W cm) demonstrate the potential use of these deposited films in gas-sensing devices for detection of environmentally significant concentrations of oxidizing species such as NO2 and O3

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.309
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.005
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it