MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6981763947

Expériences de débat public en France et au Québec

2005· other· fr· W6981763947 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenEdition (OpenEdition) · 2005
Typeother
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSociopolitical Dynamics in Nepal
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Government (linguistics)Perspective (graphical)Public life
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Démocratie participative, délibération et mouvements sociaux Séminaire organisé par le CERAPS, le CSU (IRESCO), le CRH (UMR LOUEST) et le LAIOS Séance du 13 juin 2005 De 16h à 19h – IRESCO, 59-61 Rue Pouchet, 75018 – Salle 124 Expériences de débat public en France et au Québec Durant les dernières décennies, des dispositifs participatifs ou délibératifs extrêmement divers se sont multipliés dans le monde ouvrant une série d’interrogation sur leurs natures et leurs effets. S’agit-il d’...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.349

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0290.010
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenEdition (OpenEdition)Same topicSociopolitical Dynamics in NepalFrench-language works237,207