MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6981766826

Feeling excluded in financial environments: challenges and strategies to promote financial inclusion for adults with post-stroke communication disabilities

2023· dissertation· en· W6981766826 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican Jewish Fiction Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinancial inclusionThematic analysisFeelingFinancial literacyQualitative researchFinancial servicesInclusion (mineral)Accounting management
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: People with stroke-related communication disabilities often have challenges participating in social environments, which might include challenges in financial environments. Despite the importance of financial participation of people with stroke-related communication disabilities, this topic has not yet been studied. Understanding the experiences of this group of people in financial environments can improve their financial activities and participation. Objectives: This research study explores the experiences of people with stroke-related communication disabilities in financial environments with two main objectives: 1. to examine challenges experienced by adults living with stroke-related communication disabilities in financial environments; and 2. to identify strategies for improving financial inclusion for this group. Methods: I conducted a qualitative descriptive research study and recruited four adults (18+; three women, one man) who self-identified with stroke-related speech and language disabilities in Manitoba. I used semi-structured individual interviews with open-ended questions to explore their experiences in financial environments and analyzed the data using the thematic analysis approach. Results: The four themes and four subthemes that I developed highlight that stroke-related communication disabilities made financial participation more challenging and led to financial exclusion. Most of these challenges were associated with institutional structures and the social environment. Ableism, represented by others' attitudes and reactions, affected participants’ mental well-being and financial inclusion. However, participants also identified individual and environmental strategies to improve financial inclusion. One individual strategy is practicing and being prepared in a financial environment. An environmental strategy is raising staff’s awareness about stroke-related communication disabilities. Conclusion: The findings of this research study highlight that financial environments are not inclusive for people with stroke-related communication disabilities. Rehabilitation professionals and researchers need to be aware that environments have a key influence on financial inclusion and participation. Financial professionals and policymakers could improve policies and practices, ensuring that financial services and environments are accessible and inclusive.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.907
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it