Factors of leadership in the world market of mechanical industry products
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of the article. The aim of the article is to study the progress of world engineer trends; determination of key factors of success and failures in this important industry of economy in the conditions of globalization; possibility of foreign experience application in practice of domestic enterprises functioning. The results of the analysis. From the state of innovative potential of mechanical industry, perfections of producible machines in a great deal depend on general level of national economy development, its defensive capacity, quality of population life. In a world engineer the dominant position is occupied by the small group of developed countries: the USA, Japan, Germany, France, Great Britain, Italy, and Canada. In the group of leaders are Russia, China and some small industrially developed countries. The stake of countries-leaders is high in the world export of machines (80%). Basic attention in development of engineer in the developed countries belongs to heavy engineering, motor industry, atomic and power technique, machine-tool construction, microelectronics, robotics, aviation and space-rocket industry, producing of military products. At the same time, the group of «G7» countries over the years yields to the positions of actively developing countries («E7»). General tendency in the world is transference of productions of subzero and environments from the developed countries to developing countries. This process is substantially assisted by ТNК. They create the unfolded network of branches all over the world. High qualification of workers is required in the countries of basing remain mainly R&D and difficult productions. In sufficient experience of successful innovative development of national economies (countries of ОECD, «G7», «E7») the world is accumulated. It is important to study such experience taking into account national interests (the desired changes in politics and economy, science and technique). It is necessary to envisage the presence of several blocks in the structure of strategy of engineer development: basic problems of engineer development; pre-conditions for forming of effective industrial politics; analysis of reasons of problem origin and ground of necessity of its decision by a programmatic method; the aim of the strategy; determination of optimal variant of problem decision; ways and methods for problem decision, terms for implementation of all strategy measures; organizational mechanism of the development, acceptance and realization of strategy; expected results of strategy implementation, determination of its efficiency; estimation of financial, material, technical, and labor resources which are necessary for strategy implementation; control after strategy realization. Conclusions and directions of further researches. The state of the country in such primary objectives must be realized in a maximal degree and can be highly developed considering the increase of people welfare and defense of their interests. Factors of success are the presence of leader and programs of strategic and tactical changes. Decisions are influenced by the next constituents: historical traditions – classical learning – front-rank science – powerful industry – developed economy – high quality of life – sustainable development. Powerful industry is innovative productions, foremost, in industries of engineer, with the high stake of value added in the produced products for providing of necessities of both internal and external market. The increasing necessities of citizens of the state can be satisfied only in the conditions of high-performance and rich in content labor in all spheres of vital functions. Theory, methodology and practical experience of successes and failures in the development, acceptance and realization of the programs of industrial complex development on the whole and engineers, in particular, are known. There is a need in perfection of the system of motivation and responsibility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".