Feedback controller design and process modeling methods using machine learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The recent advances in the field of machine learning, the availability of powerful computing resources, and growing data collection capabilities across industries present new opportunities to upgrade the existing feedback control and automation methods implemented in applications. This thesis presents novel approaches and methods to use machine learning algorithms to develop feedback controllers and process models for dynamical systems. In the first half of this thesis, we develop approaches to use reinforcement learning and neural networks to design feedback controllers for multivariable systems. We develop a novel model-free Q-learning approach suitable to estimate linear, unconstrained feedback controllers from noisy process data. We present a neural network (NN) design approach to approximate the model predictive control (MPC) feedback law for large-scale applications that may be out of reach with available QP solvers. The proposed NN design approach is applied to a large industrial crude distillation unit model, and we demonstrate that NNs can be used to execute MPC orders of magnitude faster compared to an available QP solver.The next half of this thesis focuses on developing hybrid model identification approaches that utilize both the advantages of neural networks and some first principles process knowledge usually available in applications. We consider building systems affected by large occupancy induced heat disturbances. For these systems, we develop a novel two step grey-box dynamic and NN disturbance model identification framework. We use a NN to model the heat disturbance so that it can be used to provide feedforward predictions of the disturbance in an MPC controller for improved energy cost optimization. We also present a hybrid modeling approach for nonlinear chemical engineering processes. For this class of systems, we use NNs to approximate some functions in the overall dynamic model, e.g, reaction kinetics, which may be challenging to parameterize using the available domain knowledge. The estimated hybrid models are used for steady-state economic optimization at the real time optimization layer. Throughout this thesis, we present examples with heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning and chemical engineering systems to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed controller design and process modeling methods. We compare the proposed methods with existing approaches and illustrate their potential to design high-performance control systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".