MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6981855895

First Nations women's experiences with perinatal care in Northern Manitoba

2024· dissertation· en· W6981855895 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWorld Wars: History, Literature, and Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersResearch Manitoba
KeywordsIndigenousCulturally appropriateHealth carePublic healthDeveloping countryPerinatal periodCultural safetyRural area
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Problem: First Nations women living in rural or remote communities in Canada are often required to leave their communities for perinatal care due to Health Canada’s Evacuation Policy. Forced evacuation disrupts traditional birthing practices and knowledge transfer and has numerous adverse effects on First Nations women, children, families, and communities. In Northern Manitoba, a large proportion of First Nations women have to travel more than two hours to give birth, and many experience a lack of choice regarding their perinatal health care, while the care available is often fragmented and culturally unsafe. Methods: This study was guided by a Two-Eyed Seeing framework and utilized Sharing Circles, an Indigenous practice used in research. I gathered the stories of First Nations mothers and Elders from Northern Manitoba as they shared their experiences of accessing care during the perinatal period. I also gathered their recommendations for changes to the perinatal care system in Northern Manitoba. Due to feasibility issues, most participants shared their stories in a one-on-one, conversational method. Results: Two mothers and three Elders from Northern Manitoba shared their stories and experiences with perinatal care. The women who were able to utilize traditional birthing practices spoke positively of these experiences, while the experiences shared about the Western medical system were largely negative. The participants also shared teachings, recommendations, and advice for First Nations mothers and for changes that can be made to the perinatal care system in Northern Manitoba to better support First Nations women and deliver more appropriate, culturally safe care. Conclusions: The perinatal care experience of many First Nations women in Northern Manitoba continues to be defined by lack of choice, communication, and support, long periods of forced travel away from community resulting in isolation and disconnection, and experiences of racism and culturally unsafe care. In order for perinatal care to be culturally safe and centred around women and families, governments, policy-makers, and health care providers must privilege the knowledges and experiences of First Nations women and families, and work with First Nations communities in their efforts to incorporate midwifery and traditional birthing practices and return birth to communities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.207
Threshold uncertainty score0.416

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0230.006
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)Same topicWorld Wars: History, Literature, and ImpactFrench-language works237,207