MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6981860239

Flicker emission of distributed wind power: analysis and mitigation solutions

2015· dissertation· en· W6981860239 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolicing Practices and Perceptions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsFlickerWind powerAC powerSizingVoltageLow voltageElectric power systemDistributed generation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this thesis is to analyze and provide solutions to the voltage flicker problem seen upon the connection of wind generators to distribution grids of low short-circuit levels and/or low reactance-to-resistance ratios (X/R ratios). The aim of this work is to mitigate the negative impact on distribution networks power quality and allow for increased penetration of wind power at the distribution level. In this thesis, control schemes for the active and reactive power flows at the wind generator bus of connection as well as planning decisions that can be made by the distribution networks operators are proposed to alleviate the voltage fluctuations impact of the intermittent resource of electric power. More specifically, the following is proposed: a modification to conventional reactive power control schemes in order to treat voltage flicker independent of the steady-state voltage level, and allow for flicker mitigation under injection of reactive power at the wind generators side; the use of a short-term energy storage system at the wind generators bus of connection, the sizing of the energy storage system is based on both the wind speed and the wind turbulence intensity at the installation site, and the control and management of the storage system are tailored to the frequency band of voltage flicker; and finally, network-based planning solutions that increase the connection point flicker suppression capacity. All the proposed solutions are studied from the flicker impact perspective and conclusions are drawn for their effectiveness in light of the given connection point characteristics and size of installed wind power. Sample results for all the proposed schemes are reproduced on a distribution-network model in a real-time simulation platform for verification purposes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.689
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicPolicing Practices and PerceptionsFrench-language works237,207