Fire protection in ammunition storage spaces on board naval craft: An evaluation of the water application rate:
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ammunition storage spaces on naval vessels are commonly fitted with drencher systems that are designed to prevent ordnance reaching a temperature where it might explode due to fast or slow âcookâoffâ. Many of these systems are traditional low pressure water spray systems that are required by the Naval Ship Code and class requirements to deliver water at a rate of between 24 â/m2/min and 32 â/m2/min. The origin of this requirement is not entirely clear. The high flow rates are a burden on system design and rapid flooding of the magazines decreases the stability of the ship due to free surface effects. The objective of this study was to evaluate the necessity of high flow rates. In addition, the feasibility of reducing them using a lower flow rate drencher system âif necessary in conjunction with a low pressure water mist systemâ was investigated. The experiments involved exposure of an instrumented steel tube, representing ordnance, to a diesel pool fire located beneath or beside it. The temperature of the tube was monitored prior to, during and after activation of the fire suppression to ensure that it did not exceed a threshold temperature of 200°C. Flow rates from the drencher system were varied and at lower flows the WMS was activated. For the fire scenarios studied, the results indicated that a flow rate of 32 â/m2/min exceeded that required to keep the temperature of the ordnance below 200 oC. At an application rate of 10 â/m² per minute, the installed drencher system suppressed the fire and the kept the temperature of the ordnance below the threshold. A dual system of drencher combined with water mist system was effective at comparable flow rates. The fire however, although controlled, was not fully extinguished in all cases. This study is part of a trilateral research project between Canada, The Netherlands and Sweden designated FiST. Results contribute to defining the way ahead in the process of evaluation of national requirements for fixed fire fighting systems for magazines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it