GELANGGANG REMAJA KOTA PALEMBANG DENGAN PENDEKATAN ARSITEKTUR KONTEMPORER
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Palembang City is a city that has a population that continues to increase every year both in terms of gender and age. From the total population, it can be seen that adolescence is very important for human development. Humans usually want to start looking for identity when entering adolescence to prepare to enter adulthood. Teenagers as the next generation have a very important role in planning the future of the country and nation where the enthusiasm of teenagers in the city of Palembang is very large for the development of the world of sports, arts and recreation. We realized that recreational activities take up a quarter of youth's free time outside the home. Teenagers' interest in various aspects is getting bigger along with the times but hindered by inadequate facilities. This is proven by the unavailability of a special container to accommodate all sports activities, artistic developments, and recreation. The existing facilities tend to be fragmented and still inadequate to support the youth's various activities. This report tries to realize a design that can accommodate all sports activities, especially basketball, futsal, as well as dance and theatre. \n \nKeywords: Youth, Sport, Interest, Talent
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it