Grating and ring based devices on SOI platform
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Silicon is the dominant material in the electronics industry, and is emerging as a promising candidate for photonics.By taking advantage of existing complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) foundries, low cost devices on the silicon-oninsulator platform are developed to address issues such as compactness, manufacturability, stability, and reliability.Active and passive photonic devices as well as integrated subsystems with high performance have been demonstrated.However, most components are under development, and various requirements need to be fulfilled before commercialization.Within the context of silicon photonics, we demonstrate several devices with improved performance using simple grating or ring structures.These devices can be used as fundamental building blocks for system level integration or individual packaged products.We start by reviewing the background of silicon photonics.A brief history of silicon photonics is introduced, followed by various fundamental building blocks designed on SOI platform.Two fabrication techniques used are described.A theoretical and experimental study of interferometric structure based filters is provided next, such as bandpass filters based on Michelson interferometers incorporating Bragg gratings, spectral shapers based on Bragg gratings in Sagnac loops, and OADMs based on Mach-Zehnder interferometers incorporating Bragg gratings (BGs).These filters can be used to provide wavelength selectivity in optical communications applications or in microwave photonics.For example, using the spectral shaper, we obtain chirped microwave pulses with central frequencies tuning range from ~10 GHz to ~30 GHz and an RF chirp rate of ~20 GHz/ns with both positive and negative signs.The OADMs exhibit transmission isolation as high as 45 dB and are tolerant to wavelength drift and misalignment between the transmitter and OADM.Multichannel OADMs are also demonstrated with similar low crosstalk performance.Finally, subwavelength gratings (SWG) are studied.SWGs have flexibility in tailoring the effective index, and SWG devices with breakthrough performance can be realized with reduced cost and footprint.We designed BGs, ring resonators, and delay lines based on SWG.We demonstrated SWG BGs with 3 dB bandwidths ~ 0.5 nm and a peak reflectivity as high as 94.4% in the C-band.The SWG ring resonators exhibit a Q-factor as high as 4,800 and the SWG race-track resonators exhibit an extinction ratio as large as 33 dB.For the SWG delay line demonstration, we achieve ~30 ps time-delay using the same length of SWG waveguides with the only difference being a 30% change in duty-cycle.These devices are compatible with other SWG building blocks and can be used to develop more complex devices with enhanced functionality for applications in communications and sensing.Life is not easy for any of us.But what of that?We must have perseverance and above all confidence in ourselves.We must believe that we are gifted for something, and that this thing, at whatever cost, must be attained.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.020 | 0.020 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".