MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6982201291

Heterogeneous photodegradation of tannic acid studied by diffuse reflectance FTIR (DRIFTS)

2009· dissertation· en· W6982201291 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2009
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphLibrary and Archives Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTannic acidPhotodegradationAdsorptionKineticsPhotocatalysisReaction mechanismHumic acid
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Little is known about the mechanism and kinetics of the photodegradation of humic like substances (HULIS) in atmospheric aerosols. Using tannic acid as a mimic for HULIS, we investigated (1) the structure of adsorbed water before and after photodegradation, (2) the mechanism and kinetics of the photodegradation of tannic acid, (3) the change in hydrophilicity of tannic acid as a result of this photochemistry, and (4) the role of NaNO2 as an external oxidant. We found that the structure of water adsorbed on tannic acid resembles that of water at the interface with polar organic solvents. The rate of tannic acid photodegradation depends more on light intensity than on humidity. No enhancement in water uptake after photodegradation was observed. External photooxidation by NaNO2 resulted in the formation of surface organonitrogen compounds. The implications of our results are discussed in relation to the aging of HULIS and their activation as cloud condensation nuclei.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)→Same topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols→French-language works237,207→