MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6982212146

High Surface Area Cu/γ-Al2O3 Catalyst Synthesized by Reverse Microemulsion Method for CO2 Conversion via Reverse Water Gas Shift

2021· dissertation· en· W6982212146 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPhysiological and biochemical adaptations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCatalysisMicroemulsionWater-gas shift reactionAdsorptionSpace velocitySelectivityCarbon monoxide
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nowadays, catalytic conversion of CO2 has gained great attention due to environmental issues caused by CO2 emissions around the world. CO2 can be considered as a source of carbon with hydrogenation (using renewable hydrogen) as a possible approach for transforming CO2 into value-added chemicals and fuels creating an artificial carbon cycle. This study investigated the catalytic performance of γ-alumina-supported copper oxide for the reverse water gas shift reaction. The catalytic nanoparticles were characterized by various analytical techniques such as XRD, SEM, TPR etc. The reverse microemulsion (RME) technique was deployed for the synthesis of highly porous CuO supported on γ-Al2O3 with a specific surface area of 369.69 m2/g. The catalytic performance of the synthesized catalyst was evaluated under various operating conditions (300-500 °C and 10,000 to 200,000 mL gcat-1 h-1). Results showed 100% CO selectivity with excellent CO2 conversion (near to equilibrium, 53%) at 500 °C. Catalyst stability test was conducted for 95 h at 1 atm and 600 °C with varying space velocities. RME-prepared Cu/γ-Al2O3 catalyst showed excellent catalytic stability and CO2 conversion of 61% at GHSV of \n60,000 and 41% at GHSV of 200,000 mL gcat-1 h-1. This study showed that reverse microemulsion \nis a promising method for developing catalysts and enhancing their functionality in thermo-catalytic reactions. \nThe CO2 adsorption mechanism was studied via in-situ FTIR. At 300 °C and low gas concentration, CO2 was physically adsorbed on the surface as carbonates and the persistent formation of CO was observed. A rate equation was suggested along and kinetic parameters were estimated in order to extrapolate the experimentally measured data. The resulting reaction rate expression with the estimated parameters was successfully implemented under various operating conditions to evaluate the catalytic performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)→Same topicPhysiological and biochemical adaptations→French-language works237,207→