MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6982214655

Hot degenerates in the montreal-cambridge-tololo survey. II. Two new hybrid white dwarfs, MCT 0128-3846 and MCT 0453-2933 and the nature of the dab stars

2015· other· en· W6982214655 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAmericanae (AECID Library) · 2015
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmerican Environmental and Regional History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBalmer seriesWhite dwarfStarsLine (geometry)Dispersion (optics)Ultraviolet astronomySpectral lineUltraviolet
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report the discovery, in the course of a survey for high-latitude, ultraviolet-excess objects in the southern hemisphere, of two new hybrid DAB stars. Both objects exhibit a weak He I λ4471 line superposed onto the usual Balmer line spectrum. Analyses of the Balmer series with both homogeneous and stratified models show these stars to have spectroscopic effective temperatures around 27,000 K. However, low­ dispersion ultraviolet observations with the lU E reveal energy distributions considerably flatter than those of normal DA stars near that effective temperature. These energy distributions are inconsistent as well as those of stratified models calculated at the temperature and hydrogen-layer mass determined from the optical spectrum. We demonstrate instead that consistent fits to the optical and ultraviolet spectrum, as well as to the energy distribution, can be achieved if these objects are unresolved, composite systems consisting of a DA white dwarf together with a DB or DBA star. The DAB spectral class thus appears inhomogeneous, and may contain both composite systems and stratified stars.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.478
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.008
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmericanae (AECID Library)Same topicAmerican Environmental and Regional HistoryFrench-language works237,207