MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6982256820

"Humanitarian Intervention: The Case of the Kurds"

2011· article· en· W6982256820 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueYork University Digital Library (York University) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic and Road Safety
Canadian institutionsOccupational Cancer Research Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSecurity councilResolution (logic)Scale (ratio)SubpoenaGeneral assembly
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I Pregident Bu.sh, in his prcss confcrcncc announcing American agneemenr to participatc in providing rclief campl for the Kunds within the tcrritory of haq, was at grcat pains to strcas irs 'humanitarian' purpocc ac authorized by Sccurity Council Resolution 688, since without guch campa rclidopcrations in the nonhern mountpiru of lraq wcrc impossiblc on thc scale nceded.Consistcnt with United Nation.sSccurity Council Resolution 688, and wurking clecly with the United Nations and other intcrnational rclief oqganizations

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0410.026
Scholarly communication0.0120.006
Open science0.0030.018
Research integrity0.0160.019
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.130
Teacher spread0.118 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueYork University Digital Library (York University)Same topicTraffic and Road SafetyFrench-language works237,207