MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6982267449

How to be a Podcast Guesting Powerhouse with Christine McAlister

2020· other· en· W6982267449 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew) · 2020
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAncient Near East History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeverage (statistics)Key (lock)Subject (documents)Simple (philosophy)InterviewCanadian literaturePublishing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PDS #143Today, I am interviewing Christine McAlister, a business coach and author of \\"The Income Replacement Formula: 7 Simple Steps to Doing What You Love and Making SIx Figures From Anywhere\\". She is also podcast show host of \\"No One's Ever Asked Me That\\" and she has been featured on Entrepreneur on Fire and by Arianna Huffington, to name a few. Our topic is very interesting. We are going to talk about how to use \\"podcast guesting\\" as a powerful tool to leverage your business. You will also discover key points to help you become a podcast guest powerhouse. *Get the free training on how to start, scale and monetize your podcast. Go to Facebook, search for my name Luis Ryan Diaz, and shoot me a message with the word \\"training\\"*In this episode:How to be a podcast guest and still able to make this about the host and the show (...and look really good in the process)What is the simple system that Christine follows when doing a podcast guestingDiscover Christine's connection strategiesWhat are the key points to become a guest powerhouseHow to be a great guest before, during and after the interviewThe subject line that Christine uses for her podcast pitchHer program, How to be a Podcast Guest Powerhouse, with 8 really simple action pack modules to monetize those appearancesResources:https://bit.ly/podcast-guest-checklist (Podcast Guest Checklist)The Book: The Income Replacement Formula Connect with Christine McAlister:http://www.lifewithpassion.com/ (Website)https://www.facebook.com/christine.a.mcalister (Facebook)https://www.facebook.com/groups/lifewithpassionsociety/ (Free Facebook Group: Income-Replacing Entrepreneurs)http://www.lifewithpassion.com/podcast (No One's Ever Asked Me That )Connect with Luis:https://www.podcastdomination.co/ (Website)https://www.instagram.com/luisryandiaz/ (Instagram)https://www.facebook.com/groups/startscalemonetize (Facebook Group)https://www.facebook.com/luisryan4 (Facebook)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.389
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4080.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.170
Teacher spread0.156 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)Same topicAncient Near East HistoryFrench-language works237,207