MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6982299485

Hydrodynamic interactions between ships during underway replenishment

2001· article· en· W6982299485 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicData Analysis and Archiving
Canadian institutionsMartec (Canada)Dalhousie UniversitySt. John’s Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTowingHead (geology)SeakeepingResponse amplitude operatorShip motionsCurrent (fluid)Numerical modelsPropulsion
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes a numerical program and experiments examining motions of waves for two ships in close proximity, as would occur during underway replenishment of naval vessels. The numerical model uses linear frequency domain approach and includes hydrodynamic interactions for predicting motions of two ships in waves. Due to a scarcity of data in the open literature, it was necessary to conduct new towing tank experiments of two ships in waves. Comparisons between predictions and experiments are encouraging for two ships travelling with forward speed in head seas. Numerical predictions for realistic seaways indicate that the presence of a larger supply ship can induce roll motions on a frigate during underway replenishment in head seas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.659
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it