I can see clearly now: Survey results from neonatal staff on mydriatic use in retinopathy or prematurity screening
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aims: \nVery preterm infants require mydriatic eye drops in preparation for retinopathy of prematurity examination. Mydriatic dosing needs to provide adequate pupil dilation for the examination and yet, avoid adverse effects. Although the relative frequency of mydriatic administration is high, there is no established or preferred mydriatic regimen in the Australia and New Zealand. \n \nThe aim of surveying neonatal health care professionals is to establish the variation in mydriatic regimens and to estimate the frequency of common to rare adverse drug events after mydriatic administration. \n \nMethods: \nA questionnaire was emailed to selected nursing and management staff at Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICU) listed in the Directory of NICU within Australia and New Zealand, 2017, the target survey participant being staff who administer the mydriatic eye drops during the retinopathy of prematurity eye examination. \n \nResults: \nForty six neonatal staff from all major regions in Australia and New Zealand participated in the survey. The majority of participants were nursing staff who administered the mydriatics. Just over half of the staff prepare their own phenylephrine and cyclopentolate eye drops and approximately a quarter used either Cyclomydril® or a combination of phenylephrine and tropicamide. \n \nIn-house compounded phenylephrine, cyclopentolate and tropicamide eye drops were diluted in the majority of cases. Staff that used the proprietary product Cyclomydril® used it undiluted (90%). Fifty four percent of staff reported that they administered one set of drops, compared to 41% gave two sets of drops and 5% administered 3 drops. No staff member reported administering more than 3 drops. \n \nThe majority of staff administered a standard drop from the end of a minim or syringe (78%). A microdrop needle and an IV cannula (with the needle removed) were used to administer a microdrop in the remainder (22%). \n \nNeonatal staff reported seeing hypertension, tachycardia, bradycardia, apnoea, feed intolerance, abdominal distension, necrotising enterocolitis, death, seizure and skin blanching after mydriatic administration. \n \nConclusions: \nThere is a wide variety of mydriatic combinations used in Australia and New Zealand and a range in frequency of adverse drug events seen after mydriatic administration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".