“Il mito del Nord fra gli artisti degli anni Venti e le scrittrici canadesi di oggi”. Visioni e Interpretazioni del Nordartico e del subartico.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Università di Siena, CISAI (Centro Interdipartimentale di Studi sull’America Indigena, 25-26 maggio 2004. La conferenza, letta al Convegno internazionale sull’Artico e l’Antartico organizzato dal Centro Interdipartimentale di Studi sull’America Indigena dell’Università di Siena, e di prossima pubblicazione negli Atti, indagava il ruolo dell’opera pittorica del Group of Seven in Canada nella scrittura di alcune autrici contemporanee. Da un lato, dunque, analisi dell’ekphrasis, dall’altro la collocazione dei risultati artistici di quel gruppo di pittori degli anni Venti in un discorso di ricerca di identità nazionale visto in termini di ideologia modernista postcoloniale, lungo le linee teoriche sviluppate di recente dalla “etnoestetica”. Il tema e l’approccio metodologico si propongono come di grande novità e originalità.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".