MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6982412056

The impact of wildfire smoke on solar photovoltaic power generation in Alberta, Canada

2024· dissertation· en· W6982412056 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Lisbon Repository (University of Lisbon) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRace, Genetics, and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotovoltaic systemSmokeSolar energyElectricity generationSolar power
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study investigates the impact of wildfire smoke on solar photovoltaic (PV) power generation in Alberta, Canada, over a five-year period. As Alberta increasingly leverages its high solar potential to meet renewable energy demand, it is confronting the effects of climate change, particularly the escalating frequency and severity of wildfires and associated smoke emissions. Smoke has the potential to impede solar irradiation, thereby posing a significant challenge to solar energy production. Understanding the complex interaction between wildfire smoke and solar energy production is crucial for effective renewable energy planning and electricity grid management in the province. This study develops a Random Forest Regression model to forecast solar energy generation in Alberta. It incorporates PM2.5 measurements as indicators of wildfire smoke, alongside environmental parameters with strong predictive potential such as Global Horizontal Irradiance, and simulated solar energy generation data from current and future grid-connected solar sites in the province. The model is later used to isolate for the impact of smoke on solar power generation within the province. It is important to note that this study encompasses completed, proposed, and under-construction projects, as well as estimated financial data. Its aim is to assess the potential impact of smoke on Alberta's solar photovoltaic production potential, rather than provide a retrospective evaluation of historical events. Findings reveal an average 6.37% decrease in solar power production during periods of moderate to severe smoke, as compared to periods without smoke present, and that severe smoke levels are responsible for 76% of all losses. These results offer critical insights into the challenges and opportunities for renewable energy development in wildfire-prone regions and emphasize the need for proactive strategies to mitigate the impacts of extreme smoke concentrations on solar energy generation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.301

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Lisbon Repository (University of Lisbon)→Same topicRace, Genetics, and Society→French-language works237,207→