MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6982427858

ILR Audit Guidance for 2002/03: funding [+ Addendum to ILR Audit Guidance for 2002/03]

2003· other· en· W6982427858 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Education Resource Archive (University College London) · 2003
Typeother
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLeukemia and Lymphoma Society of Canada
KeywordsAuditChief audit executiveAudit planAddendumJoint auditAudit evidence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This records includes 2 files. \n1. ILR Audit Guidance for Further Education in 2002/03 \n2. Addendum to ILR Audit Guidance for 2002/03 \n \n \nThis document provides audit guidance to institutions and their ILR auditors on completing the ILR for 2002/03. \nThis document includes general ILR audit guidance provided by the Learning and Skills Council (LSC). It also includes ILR audit guidance for areas of contention that have arisen during 2001/02 and concerns raised during 2000/01 external audits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.064
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.273
Threshold uncertainty score0.915

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.064
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.007
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2730.279

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Education Resource Archive (University College London)Same topicSesquiterpenes and Asteraceae StudiesFrench-language works237,207