MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6982531232

Initial design and simulation of a portable breast microwave detection device

2022· dissertation· en· W6982531232 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2022
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPentecostalism and Christianity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrowaveBreast cancerRadarMicrowave imagingArtificial neural networkPoint (geometry)Convolutional neural network
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer death for women in Canada. Access to breast cancer screening is limited in northern and First Nation communities in Canada, as well as low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) in the broader international community. Lack of accessible screening tools contribute to inequitable care and increased mortality rates. Microwave breast detection has shown promising results as a safe, low-cost breast cancer screening method. This thesis aims to design and simulate a portable microwave device suitable for use in remote and low-income areas. The device features a cylindrical array of patch antennas and, through machine learning, will require no trained personnel to operate or obtain a preliminary diagnosis. Tiny vector network analyzers were used to measure S-parameters from 0.7 - 3 GHz. A basic radar model was improved to incorporate spherical spreading, microwave attenuation, and secondary scattering. This radar model was used to simulate time-domain sinograms of dual rod models. The rod models consisted of two point scatterers with assigned reflectivities of 100% & m% or m% & m%, where m was varied as: 10%, 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90%. The simulated sinograms were used to train a convolutional neural network to locate the rod responses. The network was able to easily detect and locate the 100% rod response, but struggled with the lower 10% and 30% reflectivities. The 100% and 90% rod models performed with an accuracy of 92%. The use of machine learning improved upon conventional reconstruction methods for breast microwave radar. Similar machine learning techniques can be performed on real scans with shell-based breast phantoms. The radar model simulations can be used to increase the data set size and improve training performance through transfer learning. Microwave sensing and machine learning methods offer promising possibilities to breast cancer screening accessibility for women in remote and low-income areas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)Same topicPentecostalism and Christianity StudiesFrench-language works237,207