MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6982598612

Ireland’s retail banking crisis: lessons to learn and policy implications

2018· dissertation· en· W6982598612 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick) · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicBanking stability, regulation, efficiency
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDirectorate-General for Economic and Financial AffairsEuropean CommissionSociety for Immunotherapy of Cancer
KeywordsRetail bankingGovernment (linguistics)Banking industryPayment
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lessons have been learned since the Irish banking crisis, and important regulatory and supervisory actions have been taken both domestically and internationally.While, there exists an extensive body of research investigating the Irish banking crisis, a number of important questions remain unanswered in relation to whether the latent distress in the Irish retail banking system could have been recognised contemporaneously.To address these gaps, this thesis builds upon the existing literature in two ways.First, the main Irish banks are compared to a European sample of peers across a unique database of financial indicators using econometric analyses to see if the severe financial distress in which they found themselves could have been identified earlier.Secondly, using a case study approach, this thesis presents an original and detailed comparative analysis of the Canadian and Spanish retail banking systems to investigate whether any regulatory and supervisory lessons can be identified.These countries' commercial retail banks provide a useful benchmark given their relative resilience during the Global Financial Crisis.The main findings from this research can be summarised as follows: (1) Statistical evidence is presented which shows structural differences in the lead up to the crisis between those banks that had to be bailed out and those that did not.In particular, funding structure was the most robust predictor of performance -banks with more depository funding experienced a lower probability of being bailed out.(2) In addition, robust funding models and vigorous liquidity management were identified as important determinants of banking performance.The Spanish case study found that Spanish banks were far more internationally diversified than their Irish peers -their balance sheets thus provided greater access to capital to cushion the problems they faced when the Spanish real estate sector collapsed.The Spanish banks' unique use of countercyclical provisioning was also found to be a key differentiating factor.The Canadian case study showed that Canadian banks had higher capital levels, relied more heavily on equity and used more deposit-based funding structures compared to their Irish peers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.860
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it