MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6982611357

Investigation of factors affecting coke strength after reaction (CSR) and developing a statistical model for CSR prediction

2019· dissertation· en· W6982611357 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenMETU (Middle East Technical University) · 2019
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorrelation coefficientRegression analysisLinear regressionCokeCoefficient of determinationRegressionCoalStatistical modelPredictive modelling
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study was aimed at investigating the coke strength after reaction (CSR) prediction before coke production by regression modelling. Initially, quality parameters of studied coals, namely Australian, American and Canadian coals, were categorized to understand fluctuation in the parameters. Parameters studied consist of proximate analysis, physical properties, rheological properties, ash chemistry, petrographical analysis and coke quality parameters of the coals. After understanding remarkable difference in coal quality parameters relative to origin, regression analysis was performed for the coals under study. Highly correlated parameters were detected by correlation analysis, performed via Excel and Minitab, considering both Pearson Correlation Coefficient and p - values. Devore states that two variables show strong relationship when correlation coefficient of them is above 0.8. Absolute values of correlation coefficients above 0.8 evaluated as highly correlated. Absolute values of correlation coefficients between 0.6 and 0.8 and p – values below 0.05 also evaluated as highly correlated. Then, best subset analysis was carried out by Minitab to indicate best alternative regression model. Decision of which parameters are included into model was given by evaluating R – square, R – square (adj) and R – square (pred) of best subset analysis model alternatives. For studied Australian, American and Canadian coals, CSR prediction models were developed individually. Categorization and origin base CSR prediction model development studies created the base of CSR prediction model for coal blends. Precision of the models controlled by mean hypothesis and whether residues of model are equal to zero or not was checked. 1 – sample t test, 2 – sample t test and one-way ANOVA test were used for mean hypothesis. In addition, Origin base CSR prediction models were comprised with formulas retrieved from literature. At the end of study, CSR prediction models were developed with 96.5 %, 93.41 %, 86.21 % and 80.99 % R – square for Australian, American, Canadian coals and coal blends respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.135
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenMETU (Middle East Technical University)Same topicThermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesFrench-language works237,207