MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6982651197

Jak citovat: citační styly

2022· book· cs· W6982651197 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueVeřejné služby Informačního systému (Masarykiana Brunensis Universitas) · 2022
Typebook
Languagecs
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmerican Environmental and Regional History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdeal (ethics)Context (archaeology)Action (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Elektronická publikace Jak citovat: citační styly obsahuje pokyny k citování podle nejčastěji užívaných citačních stylů v akademickém prostředí (např. ISO 690, APA, Vancouver apod.). Pro každý citační styl jsou vždy uvedeny pokyny k zápisu jednotlivých údajů v bibliografické citaci, k formátování citací v textu a soupisu literatury. Pro vybrané typy dokumentů jsou uvedeny vzory bibliografických citací s příklady včetně vizualizace, ze kterých částí publikací se údaje do citace přebírají. Publikace je určena studentům předmětu LF: DSVIz01 Získávání vědeckých informací, LF: VLLL021 Vyhledávání lékařské literatury a základy psaní odborného textu, LF: EMIZ0311s Práce s informačními zdroji - seminář a PřF: Bi4080 Metodika vědecké práce v mikrobiologii.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.107
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.009
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0040.005
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1150.020

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.171
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it