L'abbé Choquet et la Société littéraire de La Prairie : histoire d'un échec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fondée en 1853, la Société littéraire de La Prairie connaît un succès remarquable durant ses premières années, offrant un exemple typique du mouvement d'association qui traverse le Bas-Canada au milieu du XIXe siècle. Mais au début du XXe siècle, la Société a perdu son dynamisme d'autrefois, et les activités intellectuelles n’y occupent plus guère de place. En 1923, l’abbé Élisée Choquet, jeune vicaire ambitieux, rejoint la Société avec l'espoir d'en raviver les premières ambitions et de revitaliser l’esprit intellectuel de La Prairie. Il propose différentes réformes, qui, malgré un accueil favorable, ne rencontrent pas le succès espéré. L’échec de l’abbé Choquet, qui quitte la Société en 1936, peut s'expliquer par son approche anachronique, plus en phase avec les « Instituts canadiens » du XIXe siècle qu’avec les mouvements nationalistes et catholiques des années 1930.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".