KONSTANTiNOPOLiS KiLiSESi'NiN KURULUŞU: MiTOLOJi VE TARiH
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT THE EMERGENCE OF THE CHURCH OF CONSTANTINOPLE:MYTHOLOGY AND HISTORY This paper aims at investigating the mythological and historical aspects of the referances 0n the foundations of the church of Byzantion. The paper questions the authencity of the the tradition of the Apostle Andrew as the founder of the church of Byzantion and identifies this tradition as a mythological construct of the late ninth century, and places the real foundation of the church in the first quarter of the fourth centwy The main explanation for the Andrew tradition is its late invention/or political purposes, as the tradition did not exist in the early sources. The historical perspectives have offered here are that the growth of the Byzantine capital city accompanies the rise of its religious head. The sources used here are the contemporary ecclesiastical materials and the products of the modem western scholarship 0n the field.Key wortls: Apostle Andrew, Constanti1111s. Constantinopolis, Patriarchate,Byzantine Church.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".