La nuova regolazione del gruppo bancario
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le recenti innovazioni del complesso disciplinare relativo alla materia bancaria e finanziaria suggeriscono una rivisitazione di taluni significativi aspetti della stessa. L’indagine approfondisce, pertanto, la nuova regolazione del «gruppo bancario» alla luce delle disposizioni di recepimento di alcune importanti direttive europee (CRD IV e BRRD), nonché delle riforme legislative che hanno mutato l’assetto morfologico di alcune categorie di enti creditizi. Viene sottolineato, quindi, il superamento della previgente normativa incentrata sul rapporto tra direzione unitaria ed interesse di gruppo, a fronte dell’emersione di una nuova struttura di tale entità organizzativa fondata su più intensi legami tra gli aderenti, quali è dato evincere dagli accordi di sostegno finanziario infragruppo e dal cross-guarantee scheme che, nel gruppo bancario cooperativo, reca elementi solidaristici e di profonda compenetrazione patrimoniale
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.033 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".