La fauna acompañante del langostino patagónico (Pleoticus muelleri) en el Golfo San Jorge y adyacencias: análisis de alternativas de manejo.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En el presente trabajo se evalúan distintas alternativas de manejo de la fauna acompañante de la pesca industrial del langostino patagónico (Pleoticus muelleri) en el Mar Argentino. Se analiza, además, la relación entre la captura por unidad de esfuerzo de langostino y la de merluza (Merluccius hubbsi) sobre la base de datos de observadores a bordo obtenidos en 189 mareas de buques tangoneros. Se concluye que ambas variables son independientes. Finalmente, se presentan recomendaciones de manejo. In this paper different management alternatives of Patagonian red shrimp (Pleoticus muelleri) in Argentine Sea industrial fishing bycatch are evaluated. Besides, the relationship between red shrimp and hake (Merluccius hubbsi) catch per unit effort is analyzed on the basis of data gathered by observers on board in 189 outrigger trips. It is concluded that both variables are independent. Finally, management recommendations are presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".